This was written a while ago for a Forum Post for school.
When I was snot-nosed little kid, I used to watch a show called Beakman’s World. If Bill Nye (The Science Guy) stuck his finger in a light socket, dyed his lab coat green, recruited an assistant, befriended a disgruntled man in a rat suit, had penguin puppets for fans of the show, and put over 5000 sound effects into each half hour of his show, he would be Beakman, the main character of Beakman’s World. If I remember correctly, the only time I seriously used the information fed through this show was when I tried to appear intelligent by tricking a friend with the question with “What is the largest organ in the human body?” When my 8 year old friend inevitably did not know the answer, I replied that it was in fact, our skin.
The show usually begins with Beakman’s assistant picking a few letters out (all of which have questions on a variety of topics). Then Beakman answers the questions through demonstrations, animations, or other visual aids. It is fueled by these letters, sound effects, energetic actors, animations, quick cut-away shots, and extremely bad puns.
The relevance of this show is mocked by the show’s own opening and ending penguin puppets, Don and Herb. They live in the South Pole, and watch every Beakman episode. And what do two penguins living in Antarctica need to watch Beakman for? Do they really need to know how hair grows, especially since theu do not have any hair? Will it change their daily lives to know that a bootlace worm can grow to about a hundred feet long? The relevance of the information apparently parodies itself by showing that even penguins watch it, and you should too. They don’t need this information, neither do you, but we will watch it anyway.
Although the show is based around Beakman’s answering of children’s questions, the show itself still does not bypass Postman’s theory. There is no necessary sequential order to the episodes, as they move on to new topics to keep the children interested. The show does not return to a subject once it has been done, and because of this an intellectual discourse cannot be achieved. Say for instance if Timmy watches Beakman explain how hair grows, has a question about the process, and sends a letter in, it will not be aired because Beakman has already touched on how hair grows. This follows Postmans continuity law of televison.
Beakman’s sole purpose is to explain things out, in a simple, easy to follow manner so that people watching will know some facts on the layers of skin or the sensitivity of an elephants trunk. You are left with a feeling of understanding these trivial facts, and as such are not encouraged to ask questions. There is no feeling of perplexity, the second Postman law.
The third law, avoidance of exposition is also served in this show. The anti-hero of this show, Lester (the man in the rat suit) constantly objects to Beakman’s explanations, usually offering up a nonsensical explanation of his own. Lester is portrayed as a smelly, disgusting, obnoxious fool so automatically his contributions are known to be false to the audience and therefore Beakman and his assistant stand uncontested in the show.
Beakman’s World was cancelled in by the CBS network in favor of a line-up of non-educational cartoons (the cartoons that do not try to teach but simply entertain) and for years they reigned. The slight glimmer of hope, brought about by Beakman’s cancellation, the hope that TV might return to it’s entertaining junk and stay there has been destroyed. Beakman is back. The FCC has tightened it’s requirements on Educational and Informational shows, and Fox has returned Beakman’s World this year to again entertain and educate kids. Once again networks trot out “Educational” shows which severely threaten our public discourse.
Labels: beakman, rat, television